📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 4.8 — Types of borrowing

Imagine you are reviewing a client’s portfolio that includes a substantial loan against securities (LAS). The client leveraged a high-growth equity portfolio to fund a business expansion, believing the bull market would persist indefinitely. Suddenly, a systemic market correction hits the Nifty, slashing the value of the underlying collateral by 20% within a week. As an advisor, you are no longer just managing investments; you are now managing a margin call, where the lender demands additional collateral or immediate partial repayment to restore the agreed Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio.

In the Indian financial context, a loan against securities is essentially a secured credit line where the sanctioned limit is determined by the market value of the pledged assets. The lender maintains a ‘haircut’ on these securities, which acts as a buffer against price volatility. When the market value drops, the actual LTV climbs above the permissible limit defined in the loan agreement.

This forces the borrower into a liquidity crunch, as they must either pledge more securities or inject cash to normalize the ratio. If they fail to do so, the lender retains the right to sell the pledged securities at the current market price to recover the loan amount.

This dynamic creates significant risk for both the borrower and the analyst evaluating the client’s financial health. For a professional, volatility management means ensuring that the LTV at the time of origination is conservative, ideally staying well below the maximum limit allowed by the bank. If you are modeling a client’s debt sustainability, you must incorporate a ‘stress-test’ scenario where the collateral value declines by 30-40%.

If the client cannot survive this drop without liquidating their long-term holdings, the loan structure itself is fundamentally unsound regardless of the current interest rate advantages.

Consider a case where a client pledges blue-chip equity shares to borrow funds. If the stock prices fall, the lender’s automated system will trigger a margin call. If the client is already fully invested elsewhere, they may be forced to sell other assets at a loss to satisfy the lender. This demonstrates why loans against securities should only be utilized for short-term liquidity needs or for individuals with significant cash reserves.

The primary lesson is that the security of a loan is only as robust as the volatility of the asset pledged, necessitating a disciplined buffer against market turbulence.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Many candidates incorrectly assume that a loan against securities is as stable as a home loan simply because it is ‘secured.’ The critical pitfall lies in the liquidity and volatility profile of the collateral; while real estate prices are relatively sluggish, equity market prices change by the second. An analyst must understand that the ‘security’ in LAS is dynamic and can evaporate during market panics, creating a forced-selling feedback loop that jeopardizes the client’s entire wealth strategy.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor has pledged a portfolio of equity shares worth ₹50 Lakhs with an LTV of 50%. If the market value of these shares drops to ₹35 Lakhs, which of the following is the most likely immediate consequence?

Practice Question 2

When conducting a risk assessment for a client considering a loan against liquid mutual funds, why is ‘volatility analysis’ of the underlying assets essential?

This is a companion read for Section 4.8 — Types of borrowing from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting