📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 4.8 — Types of borrowing

Imagine you are an investment advisor reviewing a client’s portfolio. You notice a significant portion of their liquid assets is deployed in high-yield Peer-to-Peer (P2P) platforms, which they believe function similarly to high-interest fixed deposits. As an analyst, your task is to disabuse them of this notion by deconstructing the risk-return profile inherent in decentralized lending. Unlike traditional banking where the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) mandates strict provisioning and capital adequacy, P2P platforms often act as mere intermediaries, leaving the lender directly exposed to the borrower’s default risk.

Risk assessment in this context requires moving beyond the ’expected yield’ advertised on the dashboard. You must scrutinize the platform’s credit underwriting standards, such as their use of CIBIL scores, psychometric testing, or proprietary algorithms for cash-flow analysis. In the Indian market, P2P lenders typically attract borrowers who have been declined by traditional commercial banks due to thin credit histories or higher debt-to-income ratios.

Consequently, the lender is effectively providing unsecured credit to sub-prime segments, where the probability of default is non-linear and difficult to price accurately without extensive historical data.

To model the risk, consider a scenario where a P2P platform promises a 12% return. If the platform has a default rate of 5% and a recovery rate of only 20% on those defaulted loans, the actual expected return is drastically lower than the headline figure. A prudent analyst must factor in these ’leakages’ to determine the net risk-adjusted return.

When comparing this to, say, a corporate bond or a debt mutual fund, the absence of a secondary market or insurance coverage (like the DICGC insurance on bank deposits) makes P2P lending illiquid and susceptible to systematic market shocks.

Ultimately, your recommendation should focus on the lack of institutional safeguards. In the event of a platform failure or a mass default cycle, the investor has little recourse beyond limited legal action against individual borrowers. This fundamentally changes the nature of the asset from a ‘fixed income’ instrument to a ‘speculative credit’ exposure. By quantifying the platform’s portfolio quality—specifically looking at their NPA ratios and recovery timelines—you provide the client with a realistic assessment of the volatility they are actually bearing.1

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often mistakenly believe that because P2P platforms are regulated by the RBI as NBFC-P2P entities, the underlying loans carry a form of sovereign or banking-grade protection. It is vital to recognize that regulation here focuses on transparency, platform conduct, and data security rather than guaranteeing the safety of the individual investor’s principal. Confusing regulatory oversight with capital protection is a dangerous oversight that undermines a risk-aware financial plan.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An investor approaches you to allocate 30% of their emergency fund into a P2P platform promising 14% annual returns, citing the high interest rate as a ’low-risk’ alternative to bank savings accounts. What is the most accurate professional response regarding the risk profile?

Practice Question 2

When evaluating a P2P platform’s credit risk management, which metric is most indicative of the ‘actual’ return an investor can expect compared to the ‘advertised’ return?

This is a companion read for Section 4.8 — Types of borrowing from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting

  1. NPA refers to Non-Performing Assets, which are loans where the interest or principal has remained unpaid for a specified period, typically 90 days in the Indian banking system. ↩︎