Imagine you are an investment adviser conducting an annual portfolio review for a long-standing client. During the meeting, the client mentions they have opened a brokerage account in their minor daughter’s name using a significant inheritance. While the intent is to secure her future, you realize the paperwork merely lists the father as the account operator without any court-appointed documentation.
As a professional, you must pause: the legal capacity of a minor to contract is null, and managing these assets without proper oversight under the Guardian and Wards Act of 1890 exposes you to severe regulatory and legal risk.
In India, a minor under the age of 18 generally lacks the legal capacity to enter into a binding contract or manage financial assets independently. When assets are bequeathed or gifted to a minor, they technically become the property of the ward, not the parent. The Guardian and Wards Act serves as the framework for appointing a guardian when a minor’s interests are at stake.
This appointment is not merely a formality for your compliance department; it is a critical gatekeeping mechanism that ensures the assets are managed solely for the benefit of the minor, shielding them from potential mismanagement or co-mingling of funds.
From a risk management perspective, the absence of a court-appointed guardian when one is required can render an investment agreement voidable. If you execute trades or rebalance a portfolio for a minor without verifiable legal standing of the representative, you risk personal liability if the minor or a court later disputes the investment strategy.
Practically, this means you must demand to see a guardianship certificate issued by a competent court or verify the legal nature of the parent-child relationship under relevant personal laws if the natural guardian is acting within their statutory scope.
Consider a case where a client attempts to withdraw assets from a minor’s account to fund a personal business venture. Without a court order authorizing such a disbursement for the specific benefit of the minor, you are duty-bound to refuse the request. Your professional judgment must prioritize the protection of the minor’s capital over the client relationship. Failing to maintain this boundary could lead to regulatory sanctions from SEBI and potential litigation, as your primary duty in this context is to the ward, not the adult who opened the account.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An adviser is approached by a grandmother who wishes to trade in a demat account opened for her minor grandson. She presents a power of attorney signed by the minor’s father. What is the most appropriate action for the adviser?
Which of the following best describes the requirement for managing property owned by a minor under the Guardian and Wards Act?
This is a companion read for Section 18.8 — Key provisions of various other acts, as applicable to investment advisory profession from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting