📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 18.8 — Key provisions of various other acts, as applicable to investment advisory profession

Imagine you are reviewing the quarterly performance of a mid-cap manufacturing firm currently under stress. While the management asserts that they are merely experiencing a temporary liquidity crunch, your analysis of their debt maturity profile and cash flow projections reveals a significant risk of default. In this context, understanding the insolvency and liquidation process is not just a legal exercise; it is a critical component of assessing the floor value of your equity investment.

When a company enters the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), the role of the Resolution Professional (RP) becomes central to determining whether the firm survives or moves toward liquidation.

In the Indian context, the IBC provides a structured hierarchy for asset recovery, often referred to as the ‘waterfall mechanism.’1 For an analyst, this mechanism determines the ‘recovery rate’ in your valuation models. If a company fails to present a viable resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors, the assets are liquidated. The priority of payments—starting with insolvency resolution costs and moving down to unsecured creditors and equity shareholders—is the primary driver of loss-given-default estimates.

Failing to account for this hierarchy often leads to overly optimistic terminal value assumptions for companies with high leverage.

Consider the case of a steel company undergoing restructuring. If your model assumes that shareholders will receive a residual payout after debt settlement, you might be overlooking the ‘absolute priority rule.’ In practice, equity holders are frequently wiped out in liquidation scenarios as the liquidation value rarely covers the claims of the operational and financial creditors. Analysts must treat the IBC not as a remote legal framework, but as a real-time valuation constraint that defines the limits of capital preservation.

When the probability of default spikes, the shift from a ‘going concern’ valuation model to a ’liquidation’ valuation model must be swift and analytical, stripping away all intangible asset assumptions.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Many candidates incorrectly assume that the IBC process prioritizes all creditors equally, or they fail to account for the ‘haircut’ that financial institutions must take during the resolution process. In reality, the market value of an equity stake in a distressed company is often zero long before the liquidation process technically completes. Analysts must distinguish between ‘resolution’ (aiming for a going concern) and ’liquidation’ (the terminal sale of assets), as the valuation implications differ drastically between the two.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

In the event of a corporate liquidation under the IBC, which of the following represents the correct priority order for the distribution of proceeds?

Practice Question 2

Which entity is responsible for managing the affairs of the corporate debtor during the CIRP under the IBC?

This is a companion read for Section 18.8 — Key provisions of various other acts, as applicable to investment advisory profession from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting

  1. The waterfall mechanism under Section 53 of the IBC dictates the order of priority, ensuring that secured financial creditors and workmen’s dues generally take precedence over other operational and unsecured debts. ↩︎