📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) Difficulty: Intermediate ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 13.3 — SEBI requirements on AIF

Imagine you are reviewing the Private Placement Memorandum (PPM) for a Category II AIF specializing in mid-market infrastructure. As an investment advisor, your client asks why the fund is capped at investing only 25% of its investable funds in a single venture. You might be tempted to view this simply as a regulatory hurdle, but for an analyst, this limit is a critical risk-management signal. It forces the fund manager to curate a basket of assets rather than betting the entire corpus on a single high-conviction, yet speculative, infrastructure play.

Concentration limits are the structural guardrails that prevent a fund from morphing into a single-asset holding company. For Category I and II AIFs, SEBI mandates that no single investee company shall receive more than 25% of the fund’s investable corpus. This rule is designed to ensure that the diversification benefit promised to investors is mathematically enforced, rather than left to the manager’s discretion.

If a fund manager identifies a lucrative deal, they are legally compelled to find other opportunities to deploy the remainder of the capital, ensuring the fund maintains its status as a collective investment vehicle.

From a valuation perspective, these limits force us to analyze the fund’s strategy in phases. If an AIF claims to focus on specialized sectors like renewable energy, the 25% cap means they must aggregate at least four separate projects to achieve full deployment. As an advisor, this allows you to assess the manager’s sourcing capabilities.

If you see a fund struggling to move past its first or second investment, the concentration limit acts as an operational bottleneck, potentially leading to ‘cash drag’ where capital remains idle. Conversely, a disciplined manager uses these limits as a framework to manage liquidity risk, preventing the over-exposure of the fund to the systemic failures of a single investee company.

Consider the operational impact during the life cycle of a fund. If a Category I AIF has a corpus of 400 crore rupees, they are restricted to a 100 crore rupee limit per entity. If the manager identifies a ‘unicorn’ with massive growth potential, they cannot pivot their entire strategy toward that entity. Understanding this allows you to manage client expectations: AIFs are not vehicles for ‘all-in’ wagers.

They are engineered to provide exposure to specialized segments while mitigating the catastrophic risk that would follow if a single major investment were to fail due to poor execution or sectoral headwinds.

Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often confuse the ‘continuing interest’ requirement with concentration limits, erroneously believing that the manager’s own stake allows them to bypass investment caps. In reality, the manager’s skin in the game is an alignment mechanism, while concentration limits are a prudential risk-diversification tool; the former does not grant a waiver for the latter. A sophisticated analyst must remember that these limits apply to the ‘investable corpus,’ which excludes expenses, whereas a manager’s continuing interest is calculated on the ’total corpus,’ making these two metrics distinct in both intent and calculation.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

A Category II AIF has an investable corpus of 800 crore rupees. What is the maximum amount it can legally invest in a single unlisted portfolio company?

Practice Question 2

How does the ‘investable corpus’ used for concentration limits differ from the ’total corpus’ used for calculating continuing interest?

This is a companion read for Section 13.3 — SEBI requirements on AIF from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting