Imagine you are an investment advisor sitting across from a client who is planning for a child’s college tuition in exactly five years. Your client wants to avoid the volatility of equity, but is wary of the interest rate risk inherent in long-term bond funds. You have two primary tools at your disposal: Fixed Maturity Plans (FMPs) and Target Maturity Funds (TMFs).
While both are designed to mitigate interest rate risk by aligning asset maturity with the investor’s horizon, their underlying structures and liquidity profiles differ significantly in the Indian market.
An FMP is a close-ended debt fund with a pre-defined maturity date. By investing in debt instruments that also mature around the same time, the fund manager locks in the yield at the time of purchase. This strategy effectively shields the investor from interest rate fluctuations, provided the units are held until maturity. However, because FMPs are close-ended, their secondary market liquidity is often dismal, making it difficult for an advisor to exit a position before the tenure ends without incurring significant costs or finding a buyer on the exchange.
Conversely, Target Maturity Funds function as open-ended index funds that track a specific bond index, such as a G-Sec or SDL index, with a defined maturity year. Unlike FMPs, TMFs offer the benefit of daily liquidity, allowing investors to subscribe or redeem at Net Asset Value (NAV) throughout the fund’s life. This open-ended structure provides the tactical flexibility required for dynamic portfolio management, whereas FMPs act more like a ‘set-it-and-forget-it’ instrument.
For a client requiring liquidity, the TMF is often the superior choice despite the slight tracking error associated with index replication.
From a research perspective, the choice between the two often comes down to the trade-off between absolute predictability and accessibility. In a rising interest rate environment, an FMP protects your client’s capital by minimizing mark-to-market volatility. However, if market conditions change or the client’s liquidity needs evolve, the TMF’s ability to allow redemption at current market prices becomes invaluable.
When building a client’s portfolio, always assess if the client truly has the stomach to hold a close-ended instrument for the full term or if the open-ended convenience of a TMF justifies a potentially different risk profile.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor has a lump sum requirement in three years and prefers to avoid interest rate volatility. Which feature best distinguishes a Target Maturity Fund (TMF) from a Fixed Maturity Plan (FMP) for this investor?
Which of the following statements accurately reflects the risk-mitigation strategy of a Target Maturity Fund (TMF)?
This is a companion read for Section 11.5 — Mutual Fund Products from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting