Imagine you are reviewing a client’s portfolio who claims to be a conservative investor but expresses frustration with the low yields of his current liquid fund. As a research analyst, you suggest a Credit Risk Fund to bridge the yield gap, but you must first explain the underlying regulatory mandate that governs these schemes.
Under SEBI guidelines, a Credit Risk Fund must invest at least 65% of its total assets in corporate debt instruments that are rated below the highest investment grade, specifically below AA+. This is a critical distinction from a Corporate Bond fund, which is mandated to maintain high credit quality.
The regulatory logic here is to provide a clear label for the risk being taken. While a Corporate Bond fund acts as a defensive anchor by holding high-rated, liquid papers, a Credit Risk Fund is explicitly designed to capture a ‘credit spread’—the additional yield an investor demands for taking on the risk of potential default or credit migration in lower-rated paper.
When building your model or recommending such a fund, you are essentially betting that the fund manager possesses superior credit analysis capabilities to select papers that will not default, despite their lower credit ratings.
Consider the practical application during a credit event, such as a liquidity crunch in the NBFC sector. A Credit Risk fund holding a high proportion of A or BBB rated papers may face a sharp NAV decline if the market perceives a deterioration in the issuer’s fundamentals, even if the bonds have not technically defaulted.
This highlights why your analysis must go beyond just looking at the ‘65% below AA+’ requirement; you must examine the specific concentration of the underlying issuers. An analyst must assess if the fund is diversified across sectors or if it is heavily skewed toward a single conglomerate, which could introduce ‘jump-to-default’ risk that wipes out the yield advantage.
Ultimately, recommending these funds requires a deep dive into the fund manager’s ‘credit conviction’ track record. You aren’t just selling a product; you are validating the manager’s process for monitoring issuer cash flows and collateral coverage. If the manager lacks a rigorous internal credit appraisal framework, the 65% exposure to lower-rated debt becomes a significant liability rather than a source of alpha.
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
According to SEBI norms, what is the minimum percentage of assets that a Credit Risk Fund must invest in corporate debt instruments rated below AA+?
Which of the following is the primary objective of a Credit Risk Fund from an investment strategy perspective?
This is a companion read for Section 11.5 — Mutual Fund Products from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting