Picture a junior analyst at a Mumbai-based wealth management firm reviewing a client’s debt portfolio during a period of rising RBI repo rates. The analyst notes that while the underlying corporate debentures in the fund have not defaulted, the Net Asset Value (NAV) of the scheme has unexpectedly dipped by 1.5% in a single month.
This is the first encounter most candidates have with Mark-to-Market (MTM) risk, which requires that financial assets be valued at their current market prices rather than their book value. In the Indian mutual fund context, this means that even if a bond’s interest payments remain secure, the portfolio’s daily NAV must reflect the prevailing market price of its constituent bonds.
MTM risk is essentially the risk that the unrealized loss on a portfolio—caused by a drop in bond prices—will materialize if the investor chooses to redeem units before the bonds reach maturity. Because bond prices have an inverse relationship with interest rates, a tightening monetary policy forces the market price of existing lower-coupon bonds downward to align with higher-yielding new issuances.
For an analyst, this is a critical valuation factor; ignoring MTM volatility can lead to poor advice when recommending long-duration gilt funds to risk-averse investors who require absolute capital stability.
Consider two debt funds: a Liquid Fund and a Long-Term Gilt Fund. The Liquid Fund maintains an ultra-short maturity profile, meaning its portfolio turnover is rapid, keeping MTM price fluctuations negligible. In contrast, the Gilt Fund, holding sovereign securities with 10-year maturities, is highly sensitive to interest rate cycles. If a client needs their capital back in six months for a house down payment, the MTM risk in the Gilt Fund could erode their principal during a rising rate cycle.
Evaluating these funds requires not just checking the credit quality, but calculating the Modified Duration1 to estimate how much the NAV will likely fall for every percentage point rise in rates.
For professional investment advisors, the takeaway is clear: MTM risk transforms a ‘safe’ debt instrument into a volatile asset class over the short term. Advisors must communicate that while the credit risk—the risk of the issuer not paying—may be near zero for government securities, the price risk remains a constant, unavoidable feature of the market. Proper portfolio construction, therefore, mandates matching the fund’s duration profile with the client’s liquidity horizon to ensure that the investor is never forced to exit at a trough caused by MTM adjustments.2
Nuance
Check Your Understanding
An investor holds a long-duration debt fund and notices the NAV has fallen for three consecutive weeks despite the fund holding high-quality sovereign securities. What is the most likely cause of this performance?
Which of the following investors is most exposed to the negative impacts of Mark-to-Market risk?
This is a companion read for Section 11.5 — Mutual Fund Products from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.
Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting
-
Modified Duration measures the sensitivity of a bond’s price to a 1% change in interest rates. It allows investors to approximate the percentage price change for a given movement in yields. ↩︎
-
Unlike ‘Held to Maturity’ accounting, which allows banks to ignore short-term price swings, mutual funds must report daily NAVs, forcing the impact of interest rate volatility onto the investor’s balance sheet immediately. ↩︎