📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 11.2 — Concepts and Terms Related to Mutual Funds

Imagine you are an investment advisor reviewing a client’s portfolio statement after a volatile week in the Indian markets. Your client is distressed because the Net Asset Value (NAV) of their equity mutual fund has dipped, even though the benchmark indices remained relatively flat. As an analyst, you must look past the price movement and dissect the components of the NAV calculation to explain this discrepancy.

The NAV is not merely a function of market returns; it is the total net assets divided by the outstanding units, and that numerator—net assets—is subject to several distinct mechanical pressures.

In the Indian mutual fund landscape, daily expenses such as management fees, custodian charges, and administrative costs are accrued daily against the fund’s assets. When these expenses are deducted from the portfolio, the net asset value per unit decreases, regardless of how well the underlying stocks are performing.

For example, if a fund holds a portfolio of blue-chip stocks that see a 0.2% price increase, but the fund’s expense ratio and service taxes result in a 0.3% deduction for the day, the NAV will record a net decline. Understanding this “expense drag” is essential for providing transparent advice to clients who expect the NAV to track market movements one-to-one.

Furthermore, the timing of dividend distributions significantly influences the NAV. When a mutual fund declares a dividend, the amount paid out is effectively removed from the fund’s assets. Consequently, the ex-dividend NAV drops by the amount of the dividend distribution. An inexperienced investor might interpret this as a capital loss, but as a professional, you must clarify that this is simply a transfer of value—moving cash from the fund’s portfolio into the investor’s bank account.

This distinction is critical when evaluating a fund’s performance metrics or comparing it against its peer group.

Finally, the influx or redemption of units can affect the total assets, though not necessarily the NAV directly. While the creation of new units through fresh subscriptions adds cash to the fund, the simultaneous issuance of new units keeps the NAV per unit theoretically neutral, assuming the entry occurs at the correct NAV.

However, if a fund incurs high transaction costs due to frequent churning of its portfolio to meet large redemption requests, the resultant portfolio turnover cost will lower the net assets. By monitoring these operational factors alongside market fluctuations, you move from being a passive reporter of numbers to a proactive analyst who manages client expectations with mathematical precision. 1 2


Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often confuse the impact of redemptions on NAV. They mistakenly believe that a massive redemption event causes the NAV to fall, but in reality, the NAV remains stable because assets and liabilities (the number of units) are removed in exact proportion. The true risk is the ’liquidity impact cost,’ where the fund manager is forced to sell high-quality assets at ‘fire-sale’ prices to meet those redemptions, which does indeed pull down the NAV.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

A mutual fund declares a dividend of ₹2.00 per unit. On the ex-dividend date, how will this action impact the fund’s NAV, assuming no other market changes occur?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following scenarios describes an operational factor that consistently exerts downward pressure on a mutual fund’s NAV?


This is a companion read for Section 11.2 — Concepts and Terms Related to Mutual Funds from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting


  1. The total expense ratio (TER) in India is capped by SEBI based on the fund’s AUM, but these costs are built into the daily NAV calculation. ↩︎

  2. Ex-dividend NAV represents the value after the dividend amount is subtracted from the cum-dividend NAV, as the payout is no longer part of the fund’s net assets. ↩︎