📚 PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) Difficulty: Beginner ℹ️ Info   ~5 min read
📌 Chapter 10.6 — Benefits, Costs and risks of Derivatives

Imagine you are reviewing the hedge position of a mid-sized Indian manufacturing firm that imports high-grade steel. The CFO presents a series of currency futures contracts, claiming they have completely ’eliminated’ the risk of rupee depreciation against the US dollar. As an analyst, your task is to verify if this is an accurate assessment or merely a misinterpretation of their hedging strategy.

By failing to distinguish between risk management and risk elimination, you risk overestimating the stability of the company’s future earnings and mispricing the potential impact of volatility on their valuation model.

Risk management involves the deliberate act of capping potential losses or offsetting exposures through strategic positions, such as buying a put option on the Nifty 50 to protect a portfolio. It is a tactical maneuver designed to keep risk within an acceptable tolerance level, defined by the firm’s specific financial policy. In contrast, risk elimination would imply that the asset or business activity is rendered completely immune to market fluctuations, a state that rarely exists in financial markets.

Even with a perfect hedge, one must contend with basis risk, which is the possibility that the price movement of the underlying asset and the derivative contract will not move in perfect lockstep.

Consider an Indian exporter who buys a forward contract to sell USD at a locked-in rate. While this protects the exporter from a sudden strengthening of the rupee, it simultaneously eliminates the opportunity to profit from a weakening rupee, effectively converting a currency risk into an opportunity cost. Furthermore, this hedge does not mitigate credit risk, or the possibility that the counterparty to the contract might default on their obligations.

By replacing one type of risk with another—such as shifting market risk to counterparty risk—the firm has clearly managed their exposure rather than eliminated it.

For an analyst, this distinction is crucial when assigning a risk premium in a Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. If you treat a hedged position as ‘risk-free,’ you will inevitably deflate the required rate of return, leading to an inflated valuation that fails to account for the residual risks remaining in the derivative structure. Recognizing that hedging is an exercise in resource allocation and boundary setting—not a total insulation from economic reality—allows you to build more resilient investment recommendations and provide a more honest assessment of a company’s financial health.


Nuance

⚠️ Nuance
Candidates often fall into the trap of viewing derivatives as ‘magic shields’ because textbooks emphasize hedging as a method of ‘removing’ risk. This is a semantic failure: in professional practice, risk is never removed; it is merely transferred, transformed, or partitioned. A seasoned analyst understands that when a firm hedges, they are actually assuming new risks, such as the operational risk of managing the margin requirements of an exchange-traded position or the liquidity risk of unwinding complex contracts in a volatile market.

Check Your Understanding

Practice Question 1

An analyst is reviewing a portfolio that has hedged its exposure to Indian IT stocks using index put options. Which statement best reflects the concept of risk management in this context?

Practice Question 2

Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the distinction between risk management and risk elimination?


This is a companion read for Section 10.6 — Benefits, Costs and risks of Derivatives from PASS Investment Adviser (Level 1) by Akhilesh Gururani, available on Amazon Kindle.

Copyright © 2026 HABSG Consulting